Friday, October 13, 2006

USC Football Pre-Game: How We Do It, Part II

Leading up to last week’s Washington game, Ted Miller of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer wrote a nice piece that explains Pete Carroll’s winning formula, but not all of it. We’ve seen bits and pieces of Carroll’s approach in various comments and in different contexts, but Miller presents a nice CliffsNotes version.

He leads with a take on a simple question we’ve all been asking ourselves, as Carroll has pulled in one No. 1 recruiting class after another: How does he get a kid like Emmanuel Moody to sign a letter of intent, when three other high school All-American running backs have also committed to USC?

To this we’ll add: How did we get so many great – not just good, but great – linebackers all in one place? How did we get the No. 1 wide receiver in the country to commit to USC three years in a row (Dwayne Jarrett, Patrick Turner, Vidal Hazelton)? How did we get the No. 1 overall recruit for ’07 (running back Mark Tyler), while also snagging Broderick Green out of Little Rock, Ark. – with the aforementioned Moody, Allen Bradford, C.J. Gable, and Stafon Johnson already enrolled?

Apparently, the answer is simple. USC Football under Carroll has created “a cult of competitiveness” built on maintaining an edge and the idea of team over the individual with no guarantees. We’ve heard this before, but we’ll let Carroll restate it as Miller quoted him:
"One of the key statements that I make to the team is that we're going to do things better than it's ever been done before," Carroll said. "That mentality has to be throughout. It has to be woven through the fabric that we will not rest, that we will not settle, that we will be relentless in pursuit of a competitive edge."
The youthful exuberance of a man half his age, the John Wooden dynasty management and the relentless salesmanship are all familiar to us. But, Miller pulls out the philosophical stuff we know the east coast biased idiots don’t get:
[Carroll is] an evangelist of focus and preparation, of living and working in the moment instead of looking ahead or behind. He tells his players to focus on the present -- not just the game ahead, not just the next practice, but the next play at practice. …

"I don't take that much pride in what's already happened," he said. "It's OK. But what are you going to do now? What's your next step?"
Mark Sanchez, our current No 2 quarterback and a former national high school player of the year, adds some insight here:
"… It's just about winning [at USC]. … If a coach [recruiting you] promises something, you know he's promising someone else. And if a coach talks bad about his own players, he might talk bad about you the next year to incoming recruits. What [Carroll] said to me was, 'We have great quarterbacks here. We think you're great. You can compete with those guys. I'm not going to tell you you can start here. But I think you're good enough to play here.' "

It's not just about getting the best athletes, though that's obviously exactly what Carroll does. He emphasizes evaluating competitiveness almost as much. He wants great athletes who want to beat out other great athletes. He also wants them to hate losing as much as he does, so they buy into the idea of team over individual.
This is good stuff, and a few ADs have recognized as much. They’ve tried to duplicate Mike Garrett’s luck – let’s be honest here – looking for Pete-like NFL rejects and philosophers. But lightning doesn’t strike twice.

Examples include Bill Callahan (reject) at Big Red, who looks more like Paul Hackett than Carroll; Dan Hawkins (philosopher), who is drawing Buffalo blanks without a blue field to play on; and Dave Wannstedt (reject), who has Pitt “winning,” albeit in the Small East.

As these wannabes are finding out, it ain’t easy to replicate what Carroll created and continues to nurture at USC. If they want to ask Carroll how he’s done it, he won’t be telling them much. He keeps the really good stuff inside Heritage Hall.

We know this because, unlike the old coaches who made visiting and learning from each other during the spring a standard practice, that sharing stuff isn’t part of Carroll’s new school process. As Ivan Maisel reported on espn.com earlier this year, our man Carroll plays it close to the vest no matter what. It doesn’t matter who you are, dagummit!
[UConn head coach Randy] Edsall said he had been turned down only once. When he first got to Connecticut in 1999, he wanted to visit the New York Jets camp. Head coach Pete Carroll told him no, because Edsall had been an assistant for then-Jaguars coach Tom Coughlin, and Carroll didn't want to risk that any information would trickle down to an AFC rival. Edsall understood. …

Now that Carroll is at USC, he allows no outside coaches to visit. Not even legends.

"I talked to Pete a couple of years ago," [Bobby] Bowden said. "I said, 'I sure would like to go out there and talk to Norm Chow. He said, 'We don't do that.'"
Back in the days when a coach could literally achieve tenure at a school, perhaps sharing made sense to the coaching fraternity. But when you live and breathe (there’s that word again) a belief that USC is “going to do things better than it's ever been done before," it simply doesn’t make sense to join the good ole’ boy network.

As Carroll told Miller, "The goals I have, have no end. I want to win forever. It's not winning a championship. It's how many can you win."

Again, this is how we do it. Fight On! Beat the Sun Devils!
east coast bias

Thursday, October 12, 2006

The Thursday Twirl


Beano Cook has a thing* for the USC Song Girls. As creepy as that sounds to Trojan fans, he’s been referencing them in his “analysis” of college football for years, while showing his ignorance and blatant east coast bias.

But it isn’t just dirty old Beano who likes them. SI recently proposed a reality show about the Song Girls, and The Wizard of Odds confessed last Monday to being a “sucker" for them. I never really thought about it much, but I think these guys are on to something …

Why don’t USC bloggers post more photos of the USC Song Girls? After all, they are one of the best aspects of the USC Football experience. Sure we have Traveler and the “solid gold sound of the University of Southern California Trojan Marching Band” and the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. All these things – besides winning and going to BCS bowl games – make our football experience greater, richer and more beautiful.

But why do the USC Song Girls get so much national recognition? Why not the Penn State cheerleaders or the Longhorn cheerleaders or Michigan or Oklahoma or Florida or even ugla?

BC? (No thanks.) Don’t the ND cheerleaders have some kind of Catholic school girl thing going on? (No.)

When you think about it, the only comparison really – in terms of the level of gratuitous national fascination – is that chick in the first row at Florida State games. She is nice looking (right), but in the end she’s just a representation of southern trailer trash hickism. (No offense.)

The thing is our USC Song Girls have class, or at least that’s the idea. Sure, sometimes they make mistakes, but they don’t tumble or jump without reason. They don’t yell or scream stuff that nobody can hear, except viewers at home. They don’t get lifted in the air by some top-heavy brutes holding their butts and looking up their skirts. They spin and kick and dance and that’s it. And that’s all they really need to do. Just be there and add to the unique experience that is USC Football by looking pretty and not trying to do too much.

USC Football is obviously the primary focus, but whether or not we admit it to ourselves, we love the Song Girls more than we’re willing to state publicly. Really, if there is any USC guy who says he’s never scanned the sidelines for a good look at the skirts, hair and legs twirling around while the band plays Pat Benatar’s “Heartbreaker,” he is flat out lying. What red-blooded USC Trojan hasn’t seen the Song Girls and let his mind wander a bit, even as play resumes after a change of possession?

Well, the Boi From Troy probably hasn’t. Not that there is anything wrong with that. We’re all part of the Trojan Family. But, I digress …

Surely some of us besides the Wiz and SI would enjoy more gratuitous Song Girl photos now and then. As long as it’s done with class and respect – like all our Displaced digs on ugla and ND (for the most part) – it shouldn’t take away from the serious commentary here, right? We already know there isn’t much to take, anyway.

Maybe we could make it a weekly thing like “Song Girl Sundays.” Maybe we could start today with “The Thursday Twirl”? Whatever.

Just don’t tell my wife … or Beano Cook for that matter.


* You may need an ESPN Insider subscription to see this link.
east coast bias

Wednesday, October 11, 2006

We Are SC: This Is How We Do It

Alright. Enough of this “a win is a win” stuff with our eyes on the polls and pending BCS ranking. It’s starting to feel like our own self-fulfilling prophecy.

Pete Carroll has said it before, and he said it again yesterday at his weekly press conference:
The polls mean nothing to me. They don't mean anything to anybody until the end. Then they're meaningful. I didn't even know if we dropped or what we did. …

It doesn't factor in. It doesn't change what we're doing or how we operate. It's just a recording of what's up this week coming up and I think it's much more a media thing than it is for us.

We've never bothered one way or another. It does mean something at the very end though and when that comes time, we'll take a look and see where we are.

You can't be any better than 5-0 so we're doing fine with that. There's a lot of work to be done. … I'm disappointed in certain aspects of production, really, in particular about defense and getting the football. ... I would say exactly the same thing if we had 10 turnovers the last two weeks …

Over the years, I know that it goes and comes and usually there'll be a bunch [of turnovers] coming up here pretty quick. We're not changing our approach to it or our attitude to our players, or our manner.
I love it. This, more than anything else that anyone can write or count, is the assurance we neeed to let us breathe. This is how we do it.

Fight On!
east coast bias

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Message from Alaska: Breathe

Leave it to a guy from our 49th state to give us an insightful take on the melodrama following USC’s two close wins in a row. (Picked up his post by way of TrojanWire.) With a few numbers and some wisecracking, he reminds us about key points in the Trojans’ last two seasons, then he goes after “The Swamp” crowd … all the way from Alaska no less. Just like a few others out in the blogosphere, I like this guy.
Five Deep Breaths, courtesy 2004
3: Winning margin, USC-Stanford, last weekend in September.
6: Winning margin, USC-Cal, very next game.
8: Winning margin, USC-Oregon State, first weekend in November.
5: Winning margin, USC-UCLA, last game of season.
36: Winning margin, USC-No. 1 Oklahoma Orange Bowl, for the national title.

Five More Deep Breaths, courtesy 2005
4: Arizona State lead with 3:44 left in game, USC-ASU, first weekend in October.
7: USC lead early in the 4th quarter, USC-Arizona, very next game.
3: Winning margin, Northern Indiana Affair, very next game.
6:22: Time remaing in game when USC took lead, USC-Fresno State.
47: Winning margin, USC-No. 11 UCLA, very next game.

And now: Inhale... Hold... Exhale... 2006!
6: Winning margin, USC-Washington State, last weekend in September.
5: Yardline on which USC intercepts WSU Hail Mary on final snap.
6: Winning margin, USC-Washington, first weekend in October.
15: Yardline on which UW's final drive stalls, despite copious time-management assistance from refs.
He goes on to call out paid journalists at espn.com and AP, before ripping off a few one-liners on the Gators. But, my favorite part is the perspective he lays out for the Trojans with short memories:
Just what do we have here:

1. Two up-market football teams blow a season's worth of want-to and luck in their once-a-year shot at the shiniest program in the country (consider: UW scored a TD on a fake kick(!) but SC was the team playing with house money? Really?)
2. With SC breaking in a new QB.
3. In the last weekend of September and first of October.
4. And, just like at least 10 times in the past two years, it almost worked.
5. And, just like at least 10 times in the past two years, SC came through.
Exactly. There may not be any college football in our 49th state, but this guy knows his numbers. Again, it’s not how we win, it’s that we win. Until that reality changes, we can breathe easy.
east coast bias

Monday, October 09, 2006

Just Win, Baby

Growing up in San Francisco’s East Bay Area, just over the hill from the Oakland Coliseum, I loved the Raiders. And even though owner Al Davis (a former USC assistant coach) moved the team down to Los Angeles in 1982, I loved them even more because they drafted Marcus Allen after his record-setting, Heisman Trophy-winning career at USC.

As a Raider, Marcus built a Hall of Fame career on and off the field, and he gained the respect of his teammates as one of the toughest players in the league. When the Raiders won the Super Bowl during the ’83 season on Marcus’s magic 74-yard run, I thought I might love the Raiders almost as much as the USC Trojans.

But then Davis started his feud with Marcus in the early '90s, trying to prevent him from getting to the Hall of Fame, and I had no choice but to hate the Raiders. Of course, Marcus maintained his professionalism and commitment to his teammates throughout the ordeal, then beat the Raiders nine out of 10 times (including the first seven straight) during his five seasons with the rival Kansas City Chiefs. It’s so nice to see how karma works. And even better to see Marcus in the Hall of Fame, enshrined as a Chief.

But I digress …

Apparently, all the worry and stress over USC’s worrisome and stressful wins the last two weeks are just wasted energy. Turns out it really doesn’t matter how we win, just so long as we do. As Scott Wolf of the Los Angeles Daily News noted this morning, the computer algorithms that make up one-third of the BCS rankings no longer take margin of victory into account. A win is a win.

Of course, wins by other teams we’ve already beaten make our wins even better. The Times’ J.A. Adande pointed out yesterday that the more Arkansas wins, particularly against ranked SEC teams, the better our 50-14 beat down of the Razorbacks looks … not just to human voters, but even more so to the BCS computers.
When the first BCS rankings come out Oct. 15, this USC team probably will be better off than you think as well. This could be a year when Carroll and the Trojans learn to love the logarithms [sic]. The computers won't think of Washington as a 20-point underdog. The data will show the Huskies were 4-1 and undefeated in Pacific 10 Conference play coming into the game.

And as long as Arkansas keeps winning Southeastern Conference games the Trojans will reap the benefits. They won't get style points from human voters who short-sell the Pac-10 or don't realize how much Washington has improved in Coach Tyrone Willingham's second year. The Trojans just need to keep plugging numbers into the win column.
Again, I hate the Raiders. But they did have it right before they messed with Marcus.

Just w…

Actually, strike that. The Raiders don’t deserve the credit, especially since they have forgotten how to win. And, again, I hate them.

Besides, we’ve got our own motto that works just fine, thank you. Fight On!
east coast bias

Sunday, October 08, 2006

USC Post-Game: Conclusion Confusion

Are we witnessing the beginning of the end, or are we just experiencing a little dip in the continued ascent of USC Football during the Pete Carroll era? Is the sky falling, or do we have expectations that are completely out of whack?

Just like the chaotic, unsatisfying end to yesterday’s game versus Washington, this season has been a little confusing for Trojan fans with short memories. USC isn’t used to sweating out close games. Supposedly.

We aren’t used to scoring less than 50 points a game. We aren’t used to opposing teams hanging around in the 4th quarter. We aren’t used to the Trojans showing no noticeable improvement from game to game. Supposedly.

In the midst of all this, we can conclude doom. Or, we can remember a few things.

A lot of people, including Pete Carroll, have compared this 2006 team to 2003. It’s easy to do – new QB, a group of freshman running backs, young but good defense. Add a big win at an SEC school to start the season, and we assume a destiny of blow out victories and another BCS title game, if not a Rose Bowl win and a split national title, like 2003.

The fact is we are not the same team we were in 2003, let alone last year or the year before that. There is no Mike Williams or Lendale White or Keneche Udeze or Mike Patterson or Reggie Bush or Matt Leinart … at least not yet. There is no Norm Chow or Ed Orgeron or Pete Carroll calling defensive plays for that matter

We have to remember that USC has had more freshmen on the field so far this year than in any other during the Carroll era for various reasons, including a rash of injuries. The Trojans are a very young team with a young coaching staff. We have to remember that our expectations are extremely high.

But perhaps we should also remind ourselves that we have stockpiled perhaps the best collection of talent of any roster in the nation. Maybe we should remind ourselves that we do have Keith Rivers and Rey Maualuga and Brian Cushing and Emmanuel Moody and Dwayne Jarrett and Steve Smith and John David Booty.

Certainly, we should remember that we are in fact 5-0 and ranked No. 3 / No. 2 in the nation. Most of all, let’s all remember that Pete Carroll is still in charge, which means we always have an opportunity to get better, play better and win better. We can't ask for anything more when that opportunity includes a legitmate shot at another National Championship.

There is so much to remember it can be confusing. But as our man Carroll told the Trojans in the locker room after yesterday’s game: “Don’t get your heads down, we won.”
east coast bias

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Tuberville Update: Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

Well, we said it here this morning, and low and behold Arkansas proved our point for us. Tommy Tuberville is in fact an idiot. If there was ever a pure example of a self-fulfilling prophecy in college football, this is it.

Tuberville was right. He spewed out his doubts this week that any SEC team can make the National Championship Game, and he got his team to do its part to prove his point … in front of 80,000 of his own fans, no less!

Forget about asking Bill Doba to compare USC versus Auburn. We’ve got Houston Nutt. We’ve taken our shots at Nutt this year, but he deserves some props today. The Razorbacks won at Auburn, and he has them improving each week.

Actually, we don’t need Nutt to compare USC versus Auburn. For one, we’ve got the 2006 scoreboard:

USC 50, Arkansas 19 at Fayetteville.
Arkansas 27, Auburn 10 at Jordan-Hare Stadium.

Secondly, the Tigers and Tuberville are now irrelevant to the BCS chase, not to mention much less annoying now that Auburn’s destiny has been fulfilled. As I’ve seen in several posts from Auburn followers, we’ll sign out like this: “War DAMN Eagle!”

Damn eagle, indeed. LOL.
east coast bias